Seaborgium

Seaborgium,  ₁₀₆Sg

General properties
Name, symbol	seaborgium, Sg
Pronunciation	i/siːˈbɔːrɡiəm/ see-BOR-gee-əm
Seaborgium in the periodic table
W ↑ Sg ↓ (Upo) dubnium ← seaborgium → bohrium
Atomic number (Z)	106
Group, block	group 6, d-block
Period	period 7
Element category	transition metal
Standard atomic weight (Ar)	[269]
Electron configuration	[Rn] 5f14 6d4 7s2 (predicted)
per shell	2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 12, 2 (predicted)
Physical properties
Phase	solid (predicted)
Density near r.t.	35.0 g/cm3 (predicted)
Atomic properties
Oxidation states	6, (5), (4), (3), 0 ​(parenthesized oxidation states are predictions)
Ionization energies	1st: 757.4 kJ/mol 2nd: 1732.9 kJ/mol 3rd: 2483.5 kJ/mol (more) (all estimated)
Atomic radius	empirical: 132 pm (predicted)
Covalent radius	143 pm (estimated)
Miscellanea
Crystal structure	​body-centered cubic (bcc) (predicted)
CAS Number	54038-81-2
History
Naming	after Glenn T. Seaborg
Discovery	Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (1974)
Most stable isotopes of seaborgium
iso NA half-life DM DE (MeV) DP 271Sg syn 1.9 min 67% α 8.54 267Rf 33% SF 269Sg syn 3.1+3.7 −1.1 min α 8.50(6) 265Rf 267Sg syn 1.4 min 17% α 8.20 263Rf 83% SF 265mSg syn 16.2 s α 8.70 261mRf 265Sg syn 8.9 s α 8.90, 8.84, 8.76 261Rf

Seaborgium is a synthetic element with symbol Sg and atomic number 106. Its most stable isotope ²⁷¹Sg has a half-life of 1.9 minutes. A more recently discovered isotope ²⁶⁹Sg has a potentially slightly longer half-life (ca. 2.1 min) based on the observation of a single decay. Chemistry experiments with seaborgium have firmly placed it in group 6 as a heavier homologue to tungsten. Seaborgium is named after Glenn T. Seaborg who was alive at the time the naming was publicized.

Seaborgium belongs to the family of transuranium elements. The element was the first to be named after a living person.

History

Discovery

Scientists working at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, USSR reported their discovery of element 106 in June 1974. Synthesis was also reported in September 1974 at the Super HILAC accelerator at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory by a joint Lawrence Berkeley/Lawrence Livermore collaboration led by Albert Ghiorso and E. Kenneth Hulet. They produced the new nuclide ²⁶³Sg by bombarding a target of ²⁴⁹Cf with ¹⁸O ions. ²⁴⁹Cf + ¹⁸O→²⁶³Sg This nuclide decays by α emission with a half-life of 0.9 ± 0.2 seconds.

Naming

Main article: Transfermium Wars

The Berkeley/Livermore collaboration suggested the name seaborgium (Sg) to honor the American chemist Glenn T. Seaborg credited as a member of the American group in recognition of his participation in the discovery of several other actinides. The name selected by the team became controversial. The IUPAC adopted unnilhexium (symbol Unh) as a temporary, systematic element name. In 1994 a committee of IUPAC recommended that element 106 be named rutherfordium and adopted a rule that no element can be named after a living person. This ruling was fiercely objected to by the American Chemical Society. Critics pointed out that a precedent had been set when einsteinium was proposed as a name during Albert Einstein's life and a survey indicated that chemists were not concerned with the fact that Seaborg was still alive. In 1997, as part of a compromise involving elements 104 to 108, the name seaborgium for element 106 was recognized internationally. The name rutherfordium was assigned to element 104 instead.

Chemical properties

Extrapolated properties

Oxidation states

Seaborgium is projected to be the third member of the 6d series of transition metals and the heaviest member of group 6 in the Periodic Table, below chromium, molybdenum and tungsten. All the members of the group readily portray their group oxidation state of +6 and the state becomes more stable as the group is descended. Thus seaborgium is expected to form a stable +6 state. For this group, stable +5 and +4 states are well represented for the heavier members and the +3 state is known but reducing, except for chromium(III).

Chemistry

Much seaborgium chemical behavior is predicted by extrapolation from its lighter congeners molybdenum and tungsten. Molybdenum and tungsten readily form stable trioxides MO₃, so seaborgium should form SgO₃. The oxides MO₃ are soluble in alkali with the formation of oxyanions, so seaborgium should form a seaborgate ion, SgO₄²⁻. In addition, WO₃ reacts with acid, suggesting similar amphotericity for SgO₃. Molybdenum oxide, MoO₃, also reacts with moisture to form a hydroxide MoO₂(OH)₂, so SgO₂(OH)₂ is also feasible. The heavier homologues readily form the volatile, reactive hexahalides MX₆ (X=Cl,F). Only tungsten forms the unstable hexabromide, WBr₆. Therefore, the compounds SgF₆ and SgCl₆ are predicted, and "eka-tungsten character" may show itself in increased stability of the hexabromide, SgBr₆. These halides are unstable to oxygen and moisture and readily form volatile oxyhalides, MOX₄ and MO₂X₂. Therefore, SgOX₄ (X=F,Cl) and SgO₂X₂ (X=F,Cl) should be possible. In aqueous solution, a variety of anionic oxyfluoro-complexes are formed with fluoride ion, examples being MOF₅⁻ and MO₃F₃³⁻. Similar seaborgium complexes are expected.

Experimental chemistry

Gas phase

Initial experiments aiming at probing the chemistry of seaborgium focused on the gas thermochromatography of a volatile oxychloride. Seaborgium atoms were produced in the reaction ²⁴⁸Cm(²²Ne,4n)²⁶⁶Sg, thermalised, and reacted with an O₂/HCl mixture. The adsorption properties of the resulting oxychloride were measured and compared with those of molybdenum and tungsten compounds. The results indicated that seaborgium formed a volatile oxychloride akin to those of the other group 6 elements:

Sg + O
₂ + 2 HCl → SgO
₂Cl
₂ + H
₂

In 2001, a team continued the study of the gas phase chemistry of seaborgium by reacting the element with O₂ in a H₂O environment. In a manner similar to the formation of the oxychloride, the results of the experiment indicated the formation of seaborgium oxide hydroxide, a reaction well known among the lighter group 6 homologues.

2 Sg + 3 O
₂ → 2 SgO
₃

SgO
₃ + H
₂O → SgO
₂(OH)
₂

Aqueous phase

In its aqueous chemistry, seaborgium has been shown to resemble its lighter homologues molybdenum and tungsten, forming a stable +6 oxidation state. Seaborgium was eluted from cation exchange resin using a HNO₃/HF solution, most likely as neutral SgO₂F₂ or the anionic complex ion [SgO₂F₃]⁻. In contrast, in 0.1 M HNO₃, seaborgium does not elute, unlike Mo and W, indicating that the hydrolysis of [Sg(H₂O)₆]⁶⁺ only proceeds as far as the cationic complex [Sg(OH)₅(H₂O)]⁺.

Summary of investigated compounds and complex ions

Formula	Names(s)
SgO2Cl2	seaborgium oxychloride ; seaborgium(VI) dioxide dichloride ; seaborgyl dichloride
SgO2F2	seaborgium oxyfluoride ; seaborgium(VI) dioxide difluoride ; seaborgyl difluoride
SgO3	seaborgium oxide ; seaborgium(VI) oxide ; seaborgium trioxide
SgO2(OH)2	seaborgium oxide hydroxide ; seaborgium(VI) dioxide dihydroxide
[SgO2F3]−	trifluorodioxoseaborgate(VI)
[Sg(OH)5(H2O)]+	aquapentahydroxyseaborgium(VI)
Sg(CO)6	seaborgium hexacarbonyl

Nucleosynthesis

Cold fusion experiments

This section deals with the synthesis of nuclei of seaborgium by so-called "cold" fusion reactions. These are processes which create compound nuclei at low excitation energy (~10–20 MeV, hence "cold"), leading to a higher probability of survival from fission. The excited nucleus then decays to the ground state via the emission of one or two neutrons only.

²⁰⁸Pb(⁵⁴Cr,xn)^262-xSg (x=1,2,3)

The first attempt to synthesise seaborgium in cold fusion reactions was performed in September 1974 by a Soviet team led by G. N. Flerov at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research at Dubna. They reported producing a 0.48 s spontaneous fission (SF) activity which they assigned to the isotope ²⁵⁹Sg. Based on later evidence it was suggested that the team most likely measured the decay of ²⁶⁰Sg and its daughter ²⁵⁶Rf. The TWG concluded that, at the time, the results were insufficiently convincing.

The Dubna team revisited this problem in 1983–1984 and were able to detect a 5 ms SF activity assigned directly to ²⁶⁰Sg.

The team at GSI studied this reaction for the first time in 1985 using the improved method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. They were able to detect ²⁶¹Sg (x=1) and ²⁶⁰Sg and measured a partial 1n neutron evaporation excitation function.

In December 2000, the reaction was studied by a team at GANIL, France and were able to detect 10 atoms of ²⁶¹Sg and 2 atoms of ²⁶⁰Sg to add to previous data on the reaction.

After a facility upgrade, the GSI team measured the 1n excitation function in 2003 using a metallic lead target. Of significance, in May 2003, the team successfully replaced the lead-208 target with more resistant lead(II) sulfide targets (PbS) which will allow more intense beams to be used in the future. They were able to measure the 1n,2n and 3n excitation functions and performed the first detailed alpha-gamma spectroscopy on the isotope ²⁶¹Sg. They detected ~1600 atoms of the isotope and identified new alpha lines as well as measuring a more accurate half-life and new EC and SF branchings. Furthermore, they were able to detect the K X-rays from the daughter rutherfordium element for the first time. They were also able to provide improved data for ²⁶⁰Sg, including the tentative observation of an isomeric level. The study was continued in September 2005 and March 2006. The accumulated work on ²⁶¹Sg was published in 2007. Work in September 2005 also aimed to begin spectroscopic studies on ²⁶⁰Sg.

The team at the LBNL recently restudied this reaction in an effort to look at the spectroscopy of the isotope ²⁶¹Sg. They were able to detect a new isomer, ^261mSg, decaying by internal conversion into the ground state. In the same experiment, they were also able to confirm a K-isomer in the daughter ²⁵⁷Rf, namely ^257m2Rf.

²⁰⁷Pb(⁵⁴Cr,xn)^261-xSg (x=1,2)

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in 1974 with identical results as for their first experiments with a Pb-208 target. The SF activities were first assigned to ²⁵⁹Sg and later to ²⁶⁰Sg and/or ²⁵⁶Rf. Further work in 1983–1984 also detected a 5 ms SF activity assigned to the parent ²⁶⁰Sg.

The GSI team studied this reaction for the first time in 1985 using the method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. They were able to positively identify ²⁵⁹Sg as a product from the 2n neutron evaporation channel.

The reaction was further used in March 2005 using PbS targets to begin a spectroscopic study of the even-even isotope ²⁶⁰Sg.

²⁰⁶Pb(⁵⁴Cr,xn)^260-xSg

This reaction was studied in 1974 by the team at Dubna. It was used to assist them in their assignment of the observed SF activities in reactions using Pb-207 and Pb-208 targets. They were unable to detect any SF, indicating the formation of isotopes decaying primarily by alpha decay.

²⁰⁸Pb(⁵²Cr,xn)^260-xSg (x=1,2)

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in their series of cold fusion reactions performed in 1974. Once again they were unable to detect any SF activities. The reaction was revisited in 2006 by the team at LBNL as part of their studies on the effect of the isospin of the projectile and hence the mass number of the compound nucleus on the yield of evaporation residues. They were able to identify ²⁵⁹Sg and ²⁵⁸Sg in their measurement of the 1n excitation function.

²⁰⁹Bi(⁵¹V,xn)^260-xSg (x=2)

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in their series of cold fusion reactions performed in 1974. Once again they were unable to detect any SF activities. In 1994, the synthesis of seaborgium was revisited using this reaction by the GSI team, in order to study the new even-even isotope ²⁵⁸Sg. Ten atoms of ²⁵⁸Sg were detected and decayed by spontaneous fission.

Hot fusion experiments

This section deals with the synthesis of nuclei of seaborgium by so-called "hot" fusion reactions. These are processes which create compound nuclei at high excitation energy (~40–50 MeV, hence "hot"), leading to a reduced probability of survival from fission and quasi-fission. The excited nucleus then decays to the ground state via the emission of 3–5 neutrons.

²³⁸U(³⁰Si,xn)^268-xSg (x=3,4,5,6)

This reaction was first studied by Japanese scientists at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) in 1998. They detected a spontaneous fission activity which they tentatively assigned to the new isotope ²⁶⁴Sg or ²⁶³Db, formed by EC of ²⁶³Sg. In 2006, the teams at GSI and LBNL both studied this reaction using the method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. The LBNL team measured an excitation function for the 4n,5n and 6n channels, whilst the GSI team were able to observe an additional 3n activity. Both teams were able to identify the new isotope ²⁶⁴Sg which decayed with a short lifetime by spontaneous fission.

²⁴⁸Cm(²²Ne,xn)^270-xSg (x=4?,5)

In 1993, at Dubna, Yuri Lazarev and his team announced the discovery of long-lived ²⁶⁶Sg and ²⁶⁵Sg produced in the 4n and 5n channels of this nuclear reaction following the search for seaborgium isotopes suitable for a first chemical study. It was announced that ²⁶⁶Sg decayed by 8.57 MeV alpha-particle emission with a projected half-life of ~20 s, lending strong support to the stabilising effect of the Z=108,N=162 closed shells. This reaction was studied further in 1997 by a team at GSI and the yield, decay mode and half-lives for ²⁶⁶Sg and ²⁶⁵Sg have been confirmed, although there are still some discrepancies. In the recent synthesis of ²⁷⁰Hs (see hassium), ²⁶⁶Sg was found to undergo exclusively SF with a short half-life (T_SF = 360 ms). It is possible that this is the ground state, (^266gSg) and that the other activity, produced directly, belongs to a high spin K-isomer, ^266mSg, but further results are required to confirm this.

A recent re-evaluation of the decay characteristics of ²⁶⁵Sg and ²⁶⁶Sg has suggested that all decays to date in this reaction were in fact from ²⁶⁵Sg, which exists in two isomeric forms. The first, ^265aSg has a principal alpha-line at 8.85 MeV and a calculated half-life of 8.9 s, whilst ^265bSg has a decay energy of 8.70 MeV and a half-life of 16.2 s. Both isomeric levels are populated when produced directly. Data from the decay of ²⁶⁹Hs indicates that ^265bSg is produced during the decay of ²⁶⁹Hs and that ^265bSg decays into the shorter-lived ^261gRf isotope. This means that the observation of ²⁶⁶Sg as a long-lived alpha emitter is retracted and that it does indeed undergo fission in a short time.

Regardless of these assignments, the reaction has been successfully used in the recent attempts to study the chemistry of seaborgium (see below).

²⁴⁹Cf(¹⁸O,xn)^267-xSg (x=4)

The synthesis of seaborgium was first realized in 1974 by the LBNL/LLNL team. In their discovery experiment, they were able to apply the new method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays to identify the new isotope ²⁶³Sg. In 1975, the team at Oak Ridge were able to confirm the decay data but were unable to identify coincident X-rays in order to prove that seaborgium was produced. In 1979, the team at Dubna studied the reaction by detection of SF activities. In comparison with data from Berkeley, they calculated a 70% SF branching for ²⁶³Sg. The original synthesis and discovery reaction was confirmed in 1994 by a different team at LBNL.

As decay product

Isotopes of seaborgium have also been observed in the decay of heavier elements. Observations to date are summarised in the table below:

Evaporation Residue	Observed Sg isotope
291Lv, 287Fl, 283Cn	271Sg
285Fl	269Sg
271Hs	267Sg
270Hs	266Sg
277Cn, 273Ds, 269Hs	265Sg
271Ds, 267Hs	263Sg
270Ds	262Sg
269Ds, 265Hs	261Sg
264Hs	260Sg

Isotopes

Main article: Isotopes of seaborgium

Isotope	Year discovered	discovery reaction
258Sg	1994	209Bi(51V,2n)
259Sg	1985	207Pb(54Cr,2n)
260Sg	1985	208Pb(54Cr,2n)
261gSg	1985	208Pb(54Cr,n)
261mSg	2009	208Pb(54Cr,n)
262Sg	2001	207Pb(64Ni,n)
263mSg	1974	249Cf(18O,4n)
263gSg	1994	208Pb(64Ni,n)
264Sg	2006	238U(30Si,4n)
265Sg	1993	248Cm(22Ne,5n)
266Sg	2004	248Cm(26Mg,4n)
267Sg	2004	248Cm(26Mg,3n)
268Sg	unknown
269Sg	2010	242Pu(48Ca,5n)
270Sg	unknown
271Sg	2003	242Pu(48Ca,3n)

There are 14 known isotopes of seaborgium (excluding meta-stable and K-spin isomers). The longest-lived is currently ²⁶⁹Sg which decays through alpha decay and spontaneous fission, with a half-life of around 2.1 minutes. The shortest-lived isotope is ²⁵⁸Sg which also decays through alpha decay and spontaneous fission. It has a half-life of 2.9 ms.

Nuclear isomerism

²⁶⁶Sg

Initial work identified an 8.63 MeV alpha-decaying activity with a half-life of ~21s and assigned to the ground state of ²⁶⁶Sg. Later work identified a nuclide decaying by 8.52 and 8.77 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of ~21s, which is unusual for an even-even nuclide. Recent work on the synthesis of ²⁷⁰Hs identified ²⁶⁶Sg decaying by SF with a short 360 ms half-life. The recent work on ²⁷⁷Cn and ²⁶⁹Hs has provided new information on the decay of ²⁶⁵Sg and ²⁶¹Rf. This work suggested that the initial 8.77 MeV activity should be reassigned to ²⁶⁵Sg. Therefore, the current information suggests that the SF activity is the ground state and the 8.52 MeV activity is a high spin K-isomer. Further work is required to confirm these assignments. A recent re-evaluation of the data has suggested that the 8.52 MeV activity should be associated with ²⁶⁵Sg and that ²⁶⁶Sg only undergoes fission.

²⁶⁵Sg

The recent direct synthesis of ²⁶⁵Sg resulted in four alpha-lines at 8.94,8.84,8.76 and 8.69 MeV with a half-life of 7.4 seconds. The observation of the decay of ²⁶⁵Sg from the decay of ²⁷⁷Cn and ²⁶⁹Hs indicated that the 8.69 MeV line may be associated with an isomeric level with an associated half-life of ~ 20 s. It is plausible that this level is causing confusion between assignments of ²⁶⁶Sg and ²⁶⁵Sg since both can decay to fissioning rutherfordium isotopes.

A recent re-evaluation of the data has indicated that there are indeed two isomers, one with a principal decay energy of 8.85 MeV with a half-life of 8.9 s, and a second isomer which decays with energy 8.70 MeV with a half-life of 16.2 s.

²⁶³Sg

The discovery synthesis of ²⁶³Sg resulted in an alpha-line at 9.06 MeV. Observation of this nuclide by decay of ^271gDs, ^271mDs and ²⁶⁷Hs has confirmed an isomer decaying by 9.25 MeV alpha emission. The 9.06 MeV decay was also confirmed. The 9.06 MeV activity has been assigned to the ground state isomer with an associated half-life of 0.3 s. The 9.25 MeV activity has been assigned to an isomeric level decaying with a half-life of 0.9 s.

Recent work on the synthesis of ^271g,mDs was resulted in some confusing data regarding the decay of ²⁶⁷Hs. In one such decay, ²⁶⁷Hs decayed to ²⁶³Sg which decayed by alpha emission with a half-life of ~ 6 s. This activity has not yet been positively assigned to an isomer and further research is required.

Spectroscopic decay schemes for ²⁶¹Sg

This is the currently accepted decay scheme for ²⁶¹Sg from the study by Streicher et al. at GSI in 2003–2006

Retracted isotopes

²⁶⁹Sg

In the claimed synthesis of ²⁹³Uuo in 1999 the isotope ²⁶⁹Sg was identified as a daughter product. It decayed by 8.74 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of 22 s. The claim was retracted in 2001. This isotope was finally created in 2010.

External links

• Chemistry in its element podcast (MP3) from the Royal Society of Chemistry's Chemistry World: Seaborgium
• Seaborgium at The Periodic Table of Videos (University of Nottingham)
• WebElements.com – Seaborgium