Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Pat Tornillo | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
|||||
Argued April 17, 1974 Decided June 25, 1974 |
|||||
Full case name | Miami Herald Publishing Company, Division of Knight Newspapers, Incorporated v. Tornillo | ||||
Citations | 418 U.S. 241 (more)
94 S. Ct. 2831; 41 L. Ed. 2d 730; 1974 U.S. LEXIS 86; 1 Media L. Rep. 1898
|
||||
Prior history | Appeal from the Supreme Court of Florida | ||||
Holding | |||||
The Court overturned a Florida state law requiring newspapers to allow equal access to political candidates in the case of a political editorial or endorsement content. | |||||
Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
Case opinions | |||||
Majority | Burger, joined by unanimous | ||||
Concurrence | Brennan, joined by Rehnquist | ||||
Concurrence | White | ||||
Laws applied | |||||
U.S. Const. amend. I |
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case that overturned a Florida state law requiring newspapers to allow equal space in their newspapers to political candidates in the case of a political editorial or endorsement content. The court held that while the statute does not "prevent [newspapers] from saying anything [they] wish" it "exacts a penalty on the basis of the content." Because newspapers are economically finite enterprises, "editors may conclude that the safe course is to avoid controversy," thereby chilling speech. Furthermore, the Court held the exercise of editorial judgment is a protected First Amendment activity. In effect, this ruling reaffirmed the constitutional principle of freedom of the press (detailed in the First Amendment) and prevented state governments from controlling the content of the press. This case illustrates the medium with the most Constitutional protection—newspapers—while Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC represents the medium with the least protection—broadcast, television, and radio.[citation needed]
Miami attorney Dan Paul, long-time attorney for the Miami Herald, was its chief lawyer in the case.[1]
See also
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 418
- Fairness doctrine
- Right of reply
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
External links
- Text of Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241 (1974) is available from: Findlaw Justia
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Pages with reference errors
- Law articles needing expert attention
- Navbox orphans
- Articles with unsourced statements from May 2012
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Free Speech Clause case law
- 1974 in United States case law
- The Miami Herald
- 1974 in Florida
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
- United States Supreme Court stubs