Male captus bene detentus
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Male captus, bene detentus (wrongly captured, properly detained) is a controversial legal doctrine, according to which the fact that a person may have been wrongly or unfairly arrested, will not prejudice a rightful detention or trial under due process.
There is state practice in support of the doctrine,[1][2][3][4] as well as contrary state practice.[5][6][7][8][9] In one of its cases the U.S. Supreme Court held that where a person from another country is apprehended by irregular means, the right to set up as defense the unlawful manner by which he was brought to a court belongs "to the Government from whose territory he was wrongfully taken".[10]
Notes
- ↑ Attorney-General v. Eichmann, 36 I.L.R. 5 (1961)
- ↑ Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519 (1952)
- ↑ United States ex el Lujan v. Gengler, 510 F.2d 62 (1975)
- ↑ United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992)
- ↑ State v. Ebrahim, 21 I.L.M. 888
- ↑ United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d 267 (1974)
- ↑ United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez 939 F.2d 1341 (1990)
- ↑ Connelly v. Director of Public Prosecutions, A.C. 1254 (1964)
- ↑ Bennett v. Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court, 3 All E.R. 138 (1993)
- ↑ Ker v. Illinois, 119 U.S. 436 (1886)
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
