MK Airlines Flight 1602
File:Mk.airlines.b747-200.9g-mkj.arp.jpg
The aircraft involved in the incident at Filton Airfield, England on 10 October 2004, four days prior to the accident
|
|
Accident summary | |
---|---|
Date | 14 October 2004 |
Summary | Pilot error due to inadequate company-related management of aircraft |
Site | Halifax Stanfield International Airport, Nova Scotia, Canada |
Passengers | 0 |
Crew | 7 |
Fatalities | 7 (all) |
Aircraft type | Boeing 747-200F |
Aircraft name | (previously Waterberg) |
Operator | MK Airlines (previously South African Airways) |
Registration | 9G-MKJ (Previously ZS-SAR) |
Flight origin | Bradley International Airport, Windsor Locks, Connecticut, US |
Stopover | Halifax Stanfield International Airport, Enfield, Nova Scotia, Canada |
Destination | Zaragoza Airport, Spain |
MK Airlines Flight 1602 was a MK Airlines Boeing 747-200F cargo flight on a flight from Halifax Stanfield International Airport, Nova Scotia, Canada to Zaragoza Airport, Spain. It crashed on take-off killing the crew of 7.[1]
Incident
The jet lifted off from Halifax, but struck the ground shortly beyond the runway. Following lift-off the tail of the jet bounced twice off the tarmac near the end of the runway and separated from the plane when it hit a mound of earth 300 metres beyond the end of the runway. The plane then headed forwards in a straight line, breaking into pieces.[2]
Rescue
Over 80 firefighters and 20 pieces of apparatus from Halifax Regional Fire and Emergency responded to the call.
Investigation
An investigation into the crash revealed that the flight crew had used the incorrect speeds and thrust setting during the take-off attempt, with incorrect take-off data being calculated when preparing the flight (incorrect V speed calculation, as the result of the crew re-using a lighter take-off weight of 240,000 kg from the aircraft's previous take-off at Bradley, instead of the correct weight of 353,000 kg). The official report blamed the company for serious non-conformances to flight and duty time, with no regulations or company rules governing maximum duty periods for loadmasters and ground engineers, resulting in increased potential for fatigue-induced errors.[3]
MK Airlines disputed the findings, citing the fact that the cockpit voice recorder was too heavily damaged in the post-crash fire to yield any information. [1]
See also
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
External links
External images | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
![]() |
- MK Airlines Flight 1602 final accident report
- MK Airlines Flight 1602 final accident report (French)
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- ↑ http://www.airfleets.net/crash/crash_report_MK%20Airlines_9G-MKJ.htm
- ↑ http://www.iasa.com.au/folders/Safety_Issues/dfdr-cvr/MK747fhalifax.html
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. (French version)
- Pages with reference errors
- Use dmy dates from July 2014
- Pages with broken file links
- Articles with French-language external links
- Airliner accidents and incidents in Canada
- Aviation accidents and incidents in 2004
- Accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 747
- Disasters in Nova Scotia
- History of Halifax, Nova Scotia
- Aviation accident stubs
- 2004 disasters in Canada
- 2004 in Nova Scotia