Lehmer's conjecture

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Lehmer's conjecture, also known as the Lehmer's Mahler measure problem, is a problem in number theory raised by Derrick Henry Lehmer.[1] The conjecture asserts that there is an absolute constant \mu>1 such that every polynomial with integer coefficients P(x)\in\mathbb{Z}[x] satisfies one of the following properties:

  • P(x) is an integral multiple of a product of cyclotomic polynomials or the monomial x, in which case \mathcal{M}(P(x))=1. (Equivalently, every complex root of P(x) is a root of unity or zero.)

There are a number of definitions of the Mahler measure, one of which is to factor P(x) over \mathbb{C} as

P(x)=a_0 (x-\alpha_1)(x-\alpha_2)\cdots(x-\alpha_D),

and then set

\mathcal{M}(P(x)) = |a_0| \prod_{i=1}^{D} \max(1,|\alpha_i|).

The smallest known Mahler measure (greater than 1) is for "Lehmer's polynomial"

P(x)= x^{10}+x^9-x^7-x^6-x^5-x^4-x^3+x+1 \,,

for which the Mahler measure is the Salem number[2]

\mathcal{M}(P(x))=1.176280818\dots \ .

It is widely believed that this example represents the true minimal value: that is, \mu=1.176280818\dots in Lehmer's conjecture.[3][4]

Motivation

Consider Mahler measure for one variable and Jensen's formula shows that if P(x)=a_0 (x-\alpha_1)(x-\alpha_2)\cdots(x-\alpha_D) then

\mathcal{M}(P(x)) = |a_0| \prod_{i=1}^{D} \max(1,|\alpha_i|).

In this paragraph denote m(P)=\log(\mathcal{M}(P(x)) , which is also called Mahler measure.

If P has integer coefficients, this shows that \mathcal{M}(P) is an algebraic number so m(P) is the logarithm of an algebraic integer. It also shows that m(P)\ge0 and that if m(P)=0 then P is a product of cyclotomic polynomials i.e. monic polynomials whose all roots are roots of unity, or a monomial polynomial of x i.e. a power x^n for some n .

Lehmer noticed[1][5] that m(P)=0 is an important value in the study of the integer sequences \Delta_n=\text{Res}(P(x), x^n-1)=\prod^D_{i=1}(\alpha_i^n-1) for monic P . If P does not vanish on the circle then \lim|\Delta_n|^{1/n}=\mathcal{M}(P) and this statement might be true even if P does vanish on the circle. By this he was led to ask

whether there is a constant c>0 such that m(P)>c provided P is not cyclotomic?,

or

given c>0, are there P with integer coefficients for which  0<m(P)<c ?

Some positive answers have been provided as follows, but Lehmer's conjecture is not yet completely proved and is still a question of much interest.

Partial results

Let P(x)\in\mathbb{Z}[x] be an irreducible monic polynomial of degree D.

Smyth [6] proved that Lehmer's conjecture is true for all polynomials that are not reciprocal, i.e., all polynomials satisfying x^DP(x^{-1})\ne P(x).

Blanksby and Montgomery[7] and Stewart[8] independently proved that there is an absolute constant C>1 such that either \mathcal{M}(P(x))=1 or[9]

\log\mathcal{M}(P(x))\ge \frac{C}{D\log D}.

Dobrowolski [10] improved this to

\log\mathcal{M}(P(x))\ge C\left(\frac{\log\log D}{\log D}\right)^3.

Dobrowolski obtained the value C ≥ 1/1200 and asymptotically C > 1-ε for all sufficiently large D. Voutier obtained C ≥ 1/4 for D ≥ 2.[11]

Elliptic analogues

Let E/K be an elliptic curve defined over a number field K, and let \hat{h}_E:E(\bar{K})\to\mathbb{R} be the canonical height function. The canonical height is the analogue for elliptic curves of the function (\deg P)^{-1}\log\mathcal{M}(P(x)). It has the property that \hat{h}_E(Q)=0 if and only if Q is a torsion point in E(\bar{K}). The elliptic Lehmer conjecture asserts that there is a constant C(E/K)>0 such that

\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge \frac{C(E/K)}{D} for all non-torsion points Q\in E(\bar{K}),

where D=[K(Q):K]. If the elliptic curve E has complex multiplication, then the analogue of Dobrowolski's result holds:

\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge  \frac{C(E/K)}{D} \left(\frac{\log\log D}{\log D}\right)^3 ,

due to Laurent.[12] For arbitrary elliptic curves, the best known result is[12]

\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge  \frac{C(E/K)}{D^3(\log D)^2},

due to Masser.[13] For elliptic curves with non-integral j-invariant, this has been improved to[12]

\hat{h}_E(Q) \ge  \frac{C(E/K)}{D^2(\log D)^2},

by Hindry and Silverman.[14]

Restricted results

Stronger results are known for restricted classes of polynomials or algebraic numbers.

If P(x) is not reciprocal then

M(P) \ge M(x^3 -x - 1) \approx 1.3247

and this is clearly best possible.[15] If further all the coefficients of P are odd then[16]

M(P) \ge M(x^2 -x - 1) \approx 1.618 .

If the field Q(α) is a Galois extension of Q then Lehmer's conjecture holds.[16]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Smyth (2008) p.324
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. David Boyd (1981). "Speculations concerning the range of Mahler's measure" Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 24(4)
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Smyth (2008) p.325
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Smyth (2008) p.326
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Smyth (2008) p.327
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Smyth (2008) p.328
  16. 16.0 16.1 Smyth (2008) p.329
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links