Koide formula

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

The Koide formula is an unexplained empirical equation discovered by Yoshio Koide in 1981. It relates the masses of the three charged leptons so well that it predicted the mass of the tau.

Formula

The Koide formula is:

Q = \frac{m_e + m_{\mu} + m_{\tau}}{(\sqrt{m_e}+\sqrt{m_{\mu}}+\sqrt{m_{\tau}})^2} \approx \frac{2}{3}.

It is clear that 13 < Q < 1. The superior bound follows if we assume that the square roots can not be negative. By Cauchy-Schwarz \tfrac{1}{3} Q can be interpreted as the squared cosine of the angle between the vector

(\sqrt{m_e},\sqrt{m_{\mu}},\sqrt{m_{\tau}})

and the vector

(1,1,1).

The mystery is in the physical value. The masses of the electron, muon, and tau are measured respectively as me = 0.510998910(13) MeV/c2, mμ = 105.658367(4) MeV/c2, and mτ = 1776.84(17) MeV/c2, where the digits in parentheses are the uncertainties in the last figures.[1] This gives Q = 0.666659(10).[2] Not only is this result odd in that three apparently random numbers should give a simple fraction, but also that Q is exactly halfway between the two extremes of ​13 (should the three masses be equal) and 1 (should one mass dominate).

While the original formula appeared in the context of preon models, other ways have been found to produce it (both by Sumino and by Koide, see references below). As a whole, however, understanding remains incomplete.

Similar matches have been found for quarks depending on running masses, and for triplets of quarks not of the same flavour.[3][4][5] With alternating quarks, chaining Koide equations for consecutive triplets, it is possible to reach a result of 173.263947(6) GeV for the mass of the top quark.[6]

Similar Formulae in literature

There are similar empirical formulae which relate other masses. Quark masses depend on the energy scale used to measure them, which makes an analysis more complicated.

Taking the heaviest three quarks, charm (1290 MeV), bottom (4370 MeV) and top (174100 MeV), gives a much closer match:

Q = \frac{m_C + m_{B} + m_{T}}{(\sqrt{m_C}+\sqrt{m_{B}}+\sqrt{m_{T}})^2} \approx \frac{2}{3}.

It is possible to get exactly 2/3 within the experimental uncertainties of the masses (as of 2015). This was noticed by Rodejohann and Zhang in the first version of their 2011 paper[7] but the observation was removed in the published version,[8] so the first published mention is in 2012 from F. G. Cao.[9]

The masses of the lightest quarks (up, down, strange) are not known well enough to test the formula but if the up quark value is taken equal to zero; in such case the proportion in the formula – including the masslessness of the up quark – reduces to one of Harari-Haut-Weyers,[10] (link) known well before Koide. It should be, then

Q = \frac{0 + m_{S} + m_{C}}{(\sqrt{0}+\sqrt{m_{S}}+\sqrt{m_{C}})^2} \approx \frac{2}{3}.

Running of particle masses

In quantum field theory, quantities like coupling constant and mass "run" with the energy scale. That is, their value depends on the energy scale at which the observation occurs, in a way described by a renormalization group equation[disambiguation needed] (RGE). One usually expects relationships between such quantities to be simple at high energies (where some symmetry is unbroken) but not at low energies, where the RG flow will have produced complicated deviations from the high energy relation. The Koide relation is exact (within experimental error) for the pole masses, which are low-energy quantities defined at different energy scales. For this reason, many physicists regard the relation as "numerology" (e.g.[11]). However, the Japanese physicist Yukinari Sumino has constructed an effective field theory in which a new gauge symmetry causes the pole masses to exactly satisfy the relation.[12] Goffinet's doctoral thesis gives a discussion on pole masses and how the Koide formula can be reformulated without taking the square roots of masses.[13]

See also

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

2

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Since the uncertainties in me and mμ are much smaller than that in mτ, the uncertainty in Q was calculated as \scriptstyle{\Delta Q = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial m_\tau}\Delta m_\tau}.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Further reading

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. (See the article's references links to "The lepton masses" and "Recent results from the MINOS experiment".)
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

  • Wolfram Alpha, link solves for the predicted tau mass from the Koide formula