File:Cat Stevens - Was Dog A Doughnut.ogg

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Cat_Stevens_-_Was_Dog_A_Doughnut.ogg(Ogg Vorbis sound file, length 0.0 s, 0 bps)

Summary

Rationale of fair use in Izitso article

This is a sound sample from a commercial recording. Its inclusion here is claimed as fair use because:

  • It illustrates an educational article that specifically discusses the song from which this sample was taken. The section of music used is discussed in the article in relation to the song's lyrics, musical and vocal style, and may contain part of the song's chorus.
  • It is a sample of no more than 30 seconds from a much longer recording, and could not be used as a substitute for the original commercial recording or to recreate the original recording.
  • It is of a lower quality than the original recording.
  • It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted sample of comparable educational value.
  • It is believed that this sample will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original recording.
  • The audio sample is a copyrighted work. U.S. copyright laws apply to this work. Should a free or public domain sample be located, it should be used in place of this audio sample.

I believe that this use of the excerpt is in good faith, and that its inclusion enhances the quality of the article Izitso, without reducing the commercial value of the recording from which it was drawn. Jagged 85 (talk) 02:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Media data and Non-free use rationale
Description This is a 30 second music sample of "Was Dog a Doughnut?" from the 1977 Cat Stevens album Izitso.
Author or
copyright owner
Cat Stevens
Source (WP:NFCC#4) Izitso
Date of publication 1977
Use in article (WP:NFCC#7) Izitso
Purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8) "Was Dog a Doughnut?" is a track that anticipated the sounds of electro and techno-pop music. As such, uploading an audio sample will be valuable in illustrating this.
Not replaceable with
free media because
(WP:NFCC#1)
n.a.
Not replaceable with
textual coverage because
(WP:NFCC#1)
Since it is a music track, text alone would not be able to accurately describe the sound.
Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3) This is a sound sample from a commercial recording. Its inclusion here is claimed as fair use because:
  • It illustrates an educational article that specifically discusses the song from which this sample was taken. The section of music used is discussed in the article in relation to the song's lyrics, musical and vocal style, and may contain part of the song's chorus.
  • It is a sample of no more than 30 seconds from a much longer recording, and could not be used as a substitute for the original commercial recording or to recreate the original recording.
  • It is of a lower quality than the original recording.
  • It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted sample of comparable educational value.
  • It is believed that this sample will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original recording.
  • The audio sample is a copyrighted work. U.S. copyright laws apply to this work. Should a free or public domain sample be located, it should be used in place of this audio sample.

I believe that this use of the excerpt is in good faith, and that its inclusion enhances the quality of the article Izitso, without reducing the commercial value of the recording from which it was drawn. Jagged 85 (talk) 01:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Respect for
commercial opportunities
(WP:NFCC#2)
n.a.
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of Izitsohttps://infogalactic.com/info/File:Cat_Stevens_-_Was_Dog_A_Doughnut.ogg

Rationale of fair use in Cat Stevens article

This is a sound sample from a commercial recording. Its inclusion here is claimed as fair use because:

  • It illustrates an educational article that specifically discusses the song from which this sample was taken. The section of music used is discussed in the article in relation to the song's lyrics, musical and vocal style, and may contain part of the song's chorus.
  • It is a sample of no more than 30 seconds from a much longer recording, and could not be used as a substitute for the original commercial recording or to recreate the original recording.
  • It is of a lower quality than the original recording.
  • It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted sample of comparable educational value.
  • It is believed that this sample will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original recording.
  • The audio sample is a copyrighted work. U.S. copyright laws apply to this work. Should a free or public domain sample be located, it should be used in place of this audio sample.

I believe that this use of the excerpt is in good faith, and that its inclusion enhances the quality of the article Cat Stevens, without reducing the commercial value of the recording from which it was drawn. Jagged 85 (talk) 02:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Rationale of fair use in Electro (music) article

This is a sound sample from a commercial recording. Its inclusion here is claimed as fair use because:

  • It illustrates an educational article that specifically discusses the song from which this sample was taken. The section of music used is discussed in the article in relation to the song's lyrics, musical and vocal style, and may contain part of the song's chorus.
  • It is a sample of no more than 30 seconds from a much longer recording, and could not be used as a substitute for the original commercial recording or to recreate the original recording.
  • It is of a lower quality than the original recording.
  • It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted sample of comparable educational value.
  • It is believed that this sample will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original recording.
  • The audio sample is a copyrighted work. U.S. copyright laws apply to this work. Should a free or public domain sample be located, it should be used in place of this audio sample.

I believe that this use of the excerpt is in good faith, and that its inclusion enhances the quality of the article Electro (music), without reducing the commercial value of the recording from which it was drawn. Jagged 85 (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Licensing

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current00:52, 6 February 2023
0.0 s (125 KB)Thales (talk | contribs)
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

The following 2 pages link to this file:

Transcode status

Update transcode status

No transcoding required.