Comparison of cognitive architectures

The following table compares cognitive architectures.

This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

Comparison of cognitive architectures
Names	Underlying theory (symbolic, connectionist, or hybrid)	Achievements	Estimated requirements	Non-laboratory usages	Activity status (active or dead + RSS news)	Year of creation	Related publications	License (if applies, for example GPL)
4CAPS	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
ACT-R	hybrid	?	?	?	active	?	Anderson, 2007
ASMO	hybrid	Many robotic systems	?	IBM internet-of-things system	active	2009	Novianto, Johnston and Williams 2010
CHREST	symbolic	?	?	?	active	1992 ^[1]	?
CLARION	hybrid	?	?	?	active	?	Sun, 2002
Copycat	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
DUAL	hybrid	?	?	?	?	?	?
EPAM	?	?	?	?	?	1959 ^[1]	?
EPIC	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
GLAIR	symbolic	?	?	?	active	?	Bona and Shapiro, 2009	?
LIDA	symbolic	?	?	?	?	?	?
MAMID	?	?	?	?	?	?	Hudlicka, 2002; 2003	?
Mibe architecture	?	?	?	?	?	1998	?
OpenCog	hybrid	chatbot, game avatar	?	misc subsystems in commercial, financial, medical	active	2001	Goertzel et al (multiple)	AGPL
Parallel terraced scan	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
Procedural Reasoning System	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
R-CAST	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
Soar	?	?	?	yes	active	1983	Laird (2012)
TinyCog	symbolic	?	?	?	active	2015	Bergmann and Fenton, 2015	GPL V3

External links

A Survey of Cognitive and Agent Architectures by the Artificial Intelligence Lab, University of Michigan
A Framework for Comparing Agent Architectures by Aaron Sloman and Matthias Scheutz, Originally Published in Proceedings UKCI'02, UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence, September 2002, Birmingham, UK
Feature-by-Feature Comparison of Cognitive Architectures started on October 2009, updated for BICA-2010
cogarch.org Cognitive Architecture Wiki