Alt-tech
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Alt-tech is a group of websites, social media platforms, and Internet service providers which have become popular among anti-establishment political activists who espouse opinions that are not considered politically correct, due to the conception that the alternative hosts provide less stringent content moderation than mainstream internet service providers.
Some alt-tech services have less stringent content moderation policies which have attracted users who were banned or restricted from more mainstream services, while some alt-tech services have been created specifically to cater to anti-establishment users.
In the 2010s, some conservatives banned from other social media platforms, and their supporters, began to post and view content on alt-tech platforms. Several alt-tech platforms were created as protectors of free speech and individual liberty, but some left-wing researchers and journalists have described as a cover for what they see as far right userbases and antisemitism on such platforms.</ref>[1]
Contents
History
Alt-tech websites were first described as such in the 2010s; they have seen an increase in popularity in the later part of that decade, as well as the early 2020s. This has been attributed, in part, to deplatforming, bans, and restrictions of activity imposed by Big Tech companies such as Facebook and Twitter, as well as other claimed SJW converged sites such as Wikipedia and YouTube. One prominent example is that these companies are frequently claimed to censor the views of right-wing groups.[2]
After the August 2017 Charlottesville "Unite the Right" rally, Internet companies such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter were criticized by left-wing opponents to pro-white activism for allegedly failing to adhere to their own terms of service, and reacted with policies aimed toward deplatforming white nationalists. Joe Mulhall, a researcher for the communist "anti-racist" organization Hope not Hate, identified the deplatforming of counterjihad organization Britain First, in 2018, and Tommy Robinson, in 2019, as two major events that spurred British social media users to join alternative platforms. The August 2018 deplatforming of Alex Jones was further referenced as a pivotal moment.
Alt-tech platforms experienced another surge in popularity in January 2021, when United States president Donald Trump, and many of his prominent followers, were suspended from Twitter and other platforms; Parler, a website with a large proportion of Trump supporters among its userbase, was taken offline when Amazon Web Services suspended their hosting several days after the protests at the United States Capitol on January 6, though it was restarted with a new host a month later.
Deen Freelon and colleagues, publishing in Science in September 2020, condemned the fact that some alt-tech websites are specifically dedicated to serving right-wing communities, naming 4chan (founded in 2003), 8chan (2013), Gab (2016), BitChute (2017) and Parler (2018) as examples. They noted that others were more ideologically neutral, such as Discord and Telegram. Discord later worked to remove right-wing figures from its userbase, and became a more left-wing platform.[3] Joe Mulhall, a senior researcher for the communist "anti-racist" group Hope not Hate, also distinguishes groups of alt-tech platforms: he says that some of them, such as DLive and Telegram, are "co-opted platforms" which have become widely popular among the right because of their minimal moderation; others including BitChute, Gab, and Parler are "bespoke platforms" which were created by people who themselves have what he describes as "far-right leanings".
Platforms
Some websites and platforms that have been described as alt-tech include:
Type | Alt-tech company | Citations | Defunct? |
---|---|---|---|
Microblogging | Gab | [4][5][6][7] | |
Parler | [4][8][7][9] | ||
Online video platform | BitChute | [4][7][10] | |
DLive (Now a mainstream left-wing live streaming website) | [11] | ||
DTube | [10] | ||
Odysee (LBRY) | [12][13] | ||
PewTube | [5][6] | Defunct | |
Rumble | [11][9] | ||
Triller | [9] | ||
Crowdfunding | GoyFundMe | [5] | Defunct |
Hatreon | [6][14] | Defunct | |
SubscribeStar | [15][16] | ||
WeSearchr | [17] | Defunct | |
Social networking service | MeWe (Now a mainstream left-wing social networking site)[18] | [11][9] | |
Minds | [7][19] | ||
Slug | [20] | ||
Thinkspot | [21][22][23][24] | ||
WrongThink | [5] | Defunct, became a 4chan like imageboard | |
News aggregator | Patriots.win | [25] | |
Voat | [17][9] | Defunct | |
Wiki encyclopedia | Infogalactic | [5][17] | |
Imageboard | 4chan | [4] | |
8chan | [4][19] | ||
Instant messaging | Signal | [11] | |
Telegram | [11][26] | ||
Online dating service | WASP Love | [5] | |
Pastebin | JustPaste.it | [19] | |
Domain name registrar and web hosting |
Epik | [27][28] | |
Civic engagement platform | CloutHub | [11] |
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
See also
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_Nazis
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedFreelon-Science
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedRoose-NYT
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedMalter-CNNMoney
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedCogley-Telegraph
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedWilson
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedZuckerman
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedEllis-Wired
- ↑ https://cancelthiscompany.com/Company-Reviews/MeWe_Review.html
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs named:1
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.