2022 Saarland state election
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 51 seats in the Landtag of Saarland 26 seats needed for a majority |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turnout | 458,223 (61.4% ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
300px Results of the election
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 2022 Saarland state election was held on 27 March 2022 to elect the 17th Landtag of Saarland. The outgoing government was a coalition of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Social Democratic Party (SPD) led by Minister-President Tobias Hans.
The election was won by the SPD in an historic landslide, capturing a majority in the Landtag and winning at least a plurality in all municipalities of Saarland, largely attributed to the personal popularity of longtime Deputy Minister-President Anke Rehlinger. This election was the first time since the 2017 North Rhine-Westphalia state election that an incumbent Minister-President was defeated for re-election, and the first time since the 2013 Bavarian state election that a party received an absolute majority in a Landtag,[1] as well as the first time since 1994 that the SPD did so in the Saarland.
Overall, the SPD won 43.5% of votes to the CDU's 28.5%, a swing of fifteen percentage points between them. The Left lost all their seats after suffering a decline of ten points. The Alternative for Germany became the only minor party in the Landtag with just under 6%, while preliminary results indicated that The Greens getting 4.995% fell just 23 votes short of the 5% electoral threshold to win seats. The Free Democratic Party also failed to enter the Landtag with 4.8%. A total of 22.3% of votes did not translate into seats due to the electoral threshold, a record high in any state election.[2]
Contents
Election date
The Landtag is elected for five years, with its term commencing when the new Landtag first meets.[3] As the previous election took place on 26 March 2017, the next election must take place before April 2022.
Electoral system
The 51 members of the Landtag are elected via closed list proportional representation using the d'Hondt method. 41 seats are distributed in three multi-member constituencies, and the remaining ten at the state level.[4] An electoral threshold of 5% of valid votes is applied to the Landtag; parties that fall below this threshold are ineligible to receive seats.[3]
Background
- REDIRECT Template:Main
- This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name. For more information follow the bold category link.
In the previous election held on 26 March 2017, the CDU, in an upset victory, remained the largest party with 40.7% of votes cast, an increase of 5.5 percentage points. The SPD declined slightly to 29.6%. The Left fell to 12.8%, a decline of 3.3 points. Alternative for Germany (AfD) contested its first election in Saarland, winning 6.2%. The Greens lost their representation in the Landtag with a result of 4.0%.
Even though the Saarland is the second smallest state by population and does not represent Germany as a whole demographically, the election proved to be of pivotal importance to the following state elections and in particular the federal election later that year. Then-SPD leader Martin Schulz led the party to new heights in early 2017 and polls showed the SPD capturing the Minister-President's office in this first election of the year, but the upset CDU victory marked the beginning of a decline in the polls both nationally and in other state elections. This decline culminated in heavy losses for the SPD in Schleswig-Holstein, in North Rhine-Westphalia and, ultimately, in the 2017 German federal election.
Similarly, this election has been seen as a test both for the ruling Traffic light coalition, new CDU-leader Friedrich Merz and the numerous state elections later in the year.
The CDU had led a grand coalition with the SPD since 2012 under Minister-President Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, which was renewed after the election. Kramp-Karrenbauer resigned as Minister-President after her, ultimately unsuccessful, entry into federal politics in February 2018, and was succeeded by Tobias Hans as Minister-President in March and as state CDU leader in October 2018.
Until July 2021, the CDU had a solid lead in the polls, but following the decline of the CDU on the federal level, the SPD surged in the polls, cemented by the personal popularity of longtime Deputy Minister-President Anke Rehlinger.
Parties
The table below lists parties currently represented in the 16th Landtag of Saarland.
Name | Ideology | Lead candidate |
2017 result | At dissolution | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes (%) | Seats | ||||||
CDU | Christian Democratic Union of Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands |
Christian democracy | Tobias Hans | 40.7% |
24 / 51
|
24 / 51
|
|
SPD | Social Democratic Party of Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands |
Social democracy | Anke Rehlinger | 29.6% |
17 / 51
|
17 / 51
|
|
Linke | The Left Die Linke |
Democratic socialism | Barbara Spaniol | 12.8% |
7 / 51
|
5 / 51
2 / 51
[lower-alpha 2] |
|
AfD | Alternative for Germany Alternative für Deutschland |
Right-wing populism | N/A[lower-alpha 1] | 6.2% |
3 / 51
|
2 / 51
|
|
Independents |
0 / 51
|
1 / 51
|
In addition to the parties already represented in the Landtag, fourteen parties collected enough signatures to be placed on the ballot.[5]
- Alliance 90/The Greens (GRÜNE)
- Free Democratic Party (FDP)
- Family Party of Germany (FAMILIE)
- Pirate Party Germany (PIRATEN)
- Free Voters (FREIE WÄHLER)
- Grassroots Democratic Party of Germany (dieBasis)
- Bunt.saar – social-ecological list (Bunt.saar)
- Ecological Democratic Party (ÖDP)
- The Humanists (Die Humanisten)
- Die PARTEI (DIE PARTEI)
- Party for Health Research (Gesundheitsforschung)
- Human Environment Animal Protection (Tierschutzpartei)
- SGV – Solidarity, Justice, Change (SGV)
- Volt Germany (Volt)
Lead candidates
The Left
Since at least 2017, the Saarland branch of The Left has been embroiled into a dispute between Thomas Lutze, state treasurer from 2013 to 2017 and chairman since 2019, and Oskar Lafontaine, who has been parliamentary leader since 2009. Lutze has been accused of manipulating internal party elections by forging documents and fraudulently paying membership dues.[6] Public audits from 2017 to 2020 and a federal review in 2021 provided no evidence of irregularities.[7] The Saarbrücken public prosecutor's office began an investigation into Lutze in March 2021, but the case was dropped in January 2022.[8][9]
In May 2021, the state executive requested that Lafontaine and former state chairwoman Astrid Schramm resign from the party, accusing them of being "the driving force behind the internal mudslinging that has been going on for years at the party's expense". They refused.[10] After the federal election in September, Lafontaine announced that he would not seek re-election to the Landtag in the upcoming state election.[11]
On 2 November 2021, deputy state chairwoman Barbara Spaniol was expelled from the Left parliamentary faction, accused of "supporting the public attacks by the state chairman against the Left faction".[12] On 10 November, she founded the Saar-Linke parliamentary group with Dagmar Ensch-Engel, who had previously resigned from the Left faction in 2018 after facing pressure from the Lafontaine camp.[6][13] On 21 November, Spaniol was elected as The Left's lead candidate for the state election, winning 85.1% support.[14][15]
AfD
In January 2022, the Alternative for Germany's state list was withdrawn by the party trustees shortly before the deadline for candidate submissions passed. Two members of the party's state executive had arbitrarily switched out the trustees, who then withdrew the list. State chairman Christian Wirth alleged that the four members involved did not support the proposed lead candidate Kai Melling. The party still competes in all three regional constituencies, which together provide 41 of the 51 members of the Landtag. However, due to the lack of a state list, the AfD is without a lead candidate.[16]
Greens
At the Alliance 90/The Greens state congress on 7 January 2022, Lisa Becker was elected as lead candidate for the state election. She was one of three candidates alongside state chairwoman Uta Sullenberger and Kiymet Goektas; the former withdrew before the ballot and Becker defeated Goektas with 110 votes to 80.[17]
FDP
Angelika Hießerich-Peter was elected as the FDP's lead candidate for the election, winning 79% of votes at a party congress.[18]
Opinion polling
Graphical summary
Party polling
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
CDU | SPD | Linke | AfD | Grüne | FDP | FW | bunt. saar |
Others | Lead |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 state election | 27 Mar 2022 | – | 28.5 | 43.5 | 2.6 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 6.8 | 15.0 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 21–25 Mar 2022 | 940 | 28 | 41 | 4 | 6.5 | 5 | 5.5 | – | – | 10 | 13 |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 21–24 Mar 2022 | 2,375 | 28 | 41 | 4 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5 | – | – | 10 | 13 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 15–18 Mar 2022 | 978 | 30 | 38 | 3.5 | 6 | 5 | 5.5 | – | – | 12 | 8 |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 15–17 Mar 2022 | 1,024 | 30 | 39 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | – | – | 10 | 9 |
INSA | 14–17 Mar 2022 | 1,000 | 31 | 39 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | – | – | 10 | 8 |
Infratest dimap | 14–16 Mar 2022 | 1,421 | 31 | 37 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | – | 3 | 9 | 6 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 3–8 Mar 2022 | 1,219 | 30 | 35.5 | 5.5 | 8.5 | 7 | 6.5 | 1 | – | 6 | 5.5 |
Infratest dimap | 8–12 Feb 2022 | 1,175 | 29 | 38 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | – | – | 8 | 9 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 1–7 Feb 2022 | 1,504 | 33 | 34 | 5 | 7 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 4 | – | 4 | 1 |
INSA | 17–24 Jan 2022 | 1,002 | 30 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | – | – | 7 | 5 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 15–24 Dec 2021 | 1,004 | 33.5 | 38 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 3 | – | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Infratest dimap | 16–20 Nov 2021 | 1,165 | 28 | 33 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 8 | – | – | 8 | 5 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 2–11 Nov 2021 | – | 29 | 38 | 4.5 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 3 | – | 3.5 | 9 |
2021 federal election | 26 Sep 2021 | – | 23.6 | 37.3 | 7.2 | 10.0 | – | 11.5 | 2.0 | – | 8.5 | 13.7 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 14–22 Jul 2021 | – | 37 | 29 | 8 | 6 | 7.5 | 5 | – | – | 7.5 | 8 |
INSA | 5–19 Jul 2021 | 1,048 | 36 | 27 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | – | – | 8 | 9 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 18–25 May 2021 | – | 24.5 | 21 | 11 | 9.5 | 17.5 | 7 | 5 | – | 4.5 | 3.5 |
INSA | 3–10 May 2021 | 1,052 | 31 | 21 | 14 | 6 | 15 | 7 | – | – | 6 | 10 |
Infratest dimap | 2–7 Nov 2020 | 1,000 | 40 | 22 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 3 | – | – | 4 | 18 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 22–29 Jun 2020 | – | 45 | 33 | 5.5 | 4 | 6 | 3.5 | – | – | 5 | 12 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 10–22 Apr 2020 | – | 40.5 | 32.5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4.5 | – | – | 3.5 | 8 |
INSA | 19 Nov–2 Dec 2019 | 1,000 | 36 | 24 | 11 | 7 | 15 | 4 | – | – | 3 | 12 |
2019 EP election | 26 May 2019 | – | 32.5 | 23.1 | 6.0 | 9.6 | 13.2 | 3.7 | 1.1 | – | 12.0 | 9.6 |
Infratest dimap | 29 Apr–6 May 2019 | 1,000 | 37 | 25 | 12 | 8 | 11 | 4 | – | – | 3 | 12 |
Infratest dimap | 14–19 Jun 2018 | 1,000 | 35 | 26 | 12 | 15 | 6 | 4 | – | – | 2 | 9 |
2017 federal election | 24 Sep 2017 | – | 32.4 | 27.1 | 12.9 | 10.1 | 6.0 | 7.6 | 0.8 | – | 3.0 | 5.3 |
2017 state election | 26 Mar 2017 | – | 40.7 | 29.6 | 12.8 | 6.2 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.4 | – | 3.0 | 11.1 |
Minister-President polling
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
100x100px | 100x100px | None/Unsure | Lead |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hans
CDU |
Rehlinger
SPD |
|||||
Wahlkreisprognose | 21–25 Mar 2022 | 940 | 33 | 59 | 8 | 26 |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 21–24 Mar 2022 | 2,375 | 30 | 57 | 13 | 27 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 15–18 Mar 2022 | 978 | 31 | 55 | 14 | 24 |
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 15–17 Mar 2022 | 1,024 | 31 | 52 | 17 | 21 |
Infratest dimap | 14–16 Mar 2022 | 1,421 | 33 | 49 | 18 | 16 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 3–8 Mar 2022 | 1,219 | 35.5 | 49.5 | 15 | 14 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 1–7 Feb 2022 | 1,504 | 43 | 46 | 11 | 3 |
Wahlkreisprognose | 15–24 Dec 2021 | 1,004 | 42 | 44 | 14 | 2 |
Infratest dimap | 16–20 Nov 2021 | 1,165 | 39 | 42 | 19 | 3 |
Infratest dimap | 2–11 Nov 2020 | 1,000 | 52 | 32 | 16 | 20 |
Infratest dimap | 8 May 2019 | 1,000 | 39 | 37 | 24 | 2 |
Party competences
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Category | CDU | SPD | Linke | AfD | Grüne | FDP | Others/None | Lead |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infratest dimap | 16–20 Nov 2021 | 1,165 | |||||||||
Economy | 27 | 33 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 18 | 6 | |||
Education | 26 | 32 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 21 | 6 | |||
Jobs | 24 | 38 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 14 | |||
Asylum | 24 | 26 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 23 | 2 | |||
Health Care | 24 | 34 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 21 | 10 | |||
Transport | 22 | 31 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 23 | 9 | |||
Social justice | 15 | 42 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 27 | |||
Environment | 12 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 34 | 4 | 18 | 13 | |||
Solving Biggest Problems | 24 | 35 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 11 | |||
Infratest dimap | 2–11 Nov 2020 | 1,000 | Corona | 55 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 41 |
Homeland security | 49 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 36 | |||
Economy | 48 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 25 | |||
Finances | 44 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 29 | |||
Jobs | 40 | 29 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 11 | |||
Health Care | 40 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 13 | |||
Education | 34 | 26 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 8 | |||
Integration | 30 | 23 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 22 | 7 | |||
Family | 25 | 37 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 16 | 12 | |||
Public transport | 20 | 25 | 6 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 22 | 3 | |||
Social justice | 19 | 35 | 21 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 14 | 14 | |||
Environment | 13 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 57 | 1 | 12 | 44 | |||
Solving Biggest Problems | 41 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 22 |
Results
File:2022 Saarland state election - composition chart.svg | ||||||
Party | Votes | % | Swing | Seats | +/– | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) | 196,801 | 43.5 | ![]() |
29 | ![]() |
|
Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) | 129,154 | 28.5 | ![]() |
19 | ![]() |
|
Alternative for Germany (AfD) | 25,719 | 5.7 | ![]() |
3 | ![]() |
|
Alliance 90/The Greens (GRÜNE) | 22,598 | 4.995 | ![]() |
0 | ![]() |
|
Free Democratic Party (FDP) | 21,618 | 4.8 | ![]() |
0 | ![]() |
|
The Left (LINKE) | 11,689 | 2.6 | ![]() |
0 | ![]() |
|
Human Environment Animal Protection | 10,391 | 2.3 | New | 0 | New | |
Free Voters | 7,636 | 1.7 | ![]() |
0 | ![]() |
|
Grassroots Democratic Party of Germany | 6,448 | 1.4 | New | 0 | New | |
Bunt.saar – social-ecological list | 6,216 | 1.4 | New | 0 | New | |
Die PARTEI | 4,716 | 1.0 | New | 0 | New | |
Family Party of Germany | 3,836 | 0.8 | ![]() |
0 | ![]() |
|
Volt Germany | 2,645 | 0.6 | New | 0 | New | |
Pirate Party Germany | 1,318 | 0.3 | ![]() |
0 | ![]() |
|
Ecological Democratic Party | 613 | 0.1 | New | 0 | New | |
SGV – Solidarity, Justice, Change | 412 | 0.1 | New | 0 | New | |
Party for Health Research | 368 | 0.1 | New | 0 | New | |
Die Humanisten | 233 | 0.1 | New | 0 | New | |
Valid | 452,411 | 98.8 | ||||
Invalid | 5,702 | 1.2 | ||||
Total | 458,113 | 100.0 | 51 | ![]() |
||
Registered voters/turnout | 746,307 | 61.4 | ![]() |
|||
Source: State Returning Officer |
Aftermath
Minister-President Tobias Hans conceded defeat on the evening of the election and claimed responsibility for the result.[19] Due to her party securing an absolute majority, Anke Rehlinger expressed her intent to govern without a coalition.[20]
Rehlinger was elected as Minister-President by the Landtag on 25 April, winning 32 votes out of 51 cast.[21]
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Cite error: Invalid <references>
tag; parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />
, or <references group="..." />
Cite error: <ref>
tags exist for a group named "lower-alpha", but no corresponding <references group="lower-alpha"/>
tag was found, or a closing </ref>
is missing
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.